OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS

ユーザーログイン

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®
Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®
¥3,718
(税込)

米国では1980年以降、投票権を持つ人のうちたった1%が選挙資金を提供しています。これが選挙資金の実態です。2015年の大統領選に拠出された資金の半分以上が、わずか約350世帯からのものでした。その4分の1はたった78人の寄付者によるもので、その全員が100万ドル以上の寄付をしていたのです。このようにたった数百の富裕層による資金提供で成り立つ選挙を行っていて、果たして「私たちは民主主義の世を生きている」と胸を張って言えるのでしょうか。この問題については議会も裁判所も、保守派は「イエス」、リベラル派は「ノー」と、意見が真っ二つに分かれています。これは民主主義をどのように定義して、どのように機能させるか、という最も根本的な政治の問題でもあります。
この議論はつまるところ、政治論に収斂するのですが、実際面ではPAC、スーパーPAC、527、501(c)(4)、ダークマネー、連邦選挙委員会、IRS(Internal Revenue Service = 米・国税庁)に関する法律や規制、裁判所の判断などに関わっています。本書は、これらの法律、規制、判決が、民主主義をどのように機能させるかという大きな議論の中で、どのように位置づけられるかを説明します。
   

  • The only existing general introduction to campaign finance
  • Raises questions not only of how much money is spent, but where it comes from and debates about where the money should come from
  • Explains why campaign finance is a bigger issue in the current presidential primary campaign than it has ever been, and that will continue in the general election
  • Illuminates the political battle over replacing Justice Scalia, which will affect future, and maybe past, Supreme Court decisions on campaign finance

  
The one percent has been providing an ever larger share of campaign funds since the 1980s. Well over half of the money contributed to the presidential race in 2015 came from only about 350 families. One-fourth of it came from just seventy-eight donors, all of whom made contributions of $1 million or more. Can we still say we live in a democracy if a few hundred rich families provide such disproportionate shares of campaign funds? Congress and the courts are divided on that question, with conservatives saying yes and liberals saying no. The debate is about the most fundamental of political questions: how we define democracy, and how we want our democracy to work. 
       
The debate may ultimately be about political theory, but in practice it is conducted in terms of laws, regulations, and court decisions about PACs, super PACs, 527s, 501(c)(4)s, dark money, the Federal Election Commission, and even the IRS. This book explains how those laws, regulations, and court decisions fit into the larger debate about how we want our democracy to work.

目次: 

Acknowledgments
Introduction

1 What is the campaign finance problem?
What is the disagreement between supporters and opponents of reform?
How big a problem is quid pro quo corruption?
Whether the problem is political corruption or political inequality, campaign finance is about paying for election campaigns. How much do they cost?
Do elections cost a lot more now than they used to?
Is it true that the candidate with the most money always wins?
Where do candidates get the money to pay for their campaigns?
What is the role of political parties?
How has Congress regulated money in elections?
What is the state of the Federal Election Campaign Act today?

2 Watergate and Buckley v. Valeo
What was Watergate?
What was the campaign finance part of Watergate?
How did Congress change campaign finance law after Watergate?
Who were Buckley and Valeo?
Why did Senator Buckley and the other challengers think the 1974 reforms were unconstitutional?
How did the circuit court decide Buckley v. Valeo?
How did the Supreme Court decide Buckley v. Valeo?
How did the challengers, the defenders, and the justices deal with the reform goals of curbing campaign costs, preventing corruption, and promoting equality?
Why is Buckley v. Valeo still important today?

3 The rise and fall of public funding
How does the Presidential Election Campaign Fund work?
Did Congress come up with the idea of public funding in response to Watergate?
What did reformers hope to accomplish by using public funds to pay for elections?
Why was Senator Long's public funding bill so controversial?
If the income tax checkoff was so controversial in the 1960s, how did it survive the political battles in Congress?
What happened to the tax incentives for small contributions that Congress passed in 1971?
Why did the public funding program pay for the party conventions as well as the elections?
Why did Congress repeal public funding for party conventions?
How does the public funding program treat minor parties?
How does the public funding program treat independents?
Did public funding meet its goal of bringing in new, small donors?
Public funding is also supposed to bring in new candidates. Did the presidential program do that?
But participation in the tax checkoff had dropped by 2012. Did the same thing happen with public opinion?
What kinds of public funding programs are the states enacting?
Which states subsidize election campaigns?
Which cities have public funding programs?
How does New York City's public funding program work?
How well did the presidential public funding program work?

4 Disclosure and the federal election commission
What does the FEC do?
Why did Congress create the Federal Election Commission?
How does the FEC work? Is it like other independent agencies?
How well does the current disclosure law work?
How does the FEC enforce other parts of the FECA?
Why are there so many partisan deadlocks on the FEC?
Why has disclosure become so controversial?
What are the intimidation charges raised by opponents of disclosure?

5 Political action committees
Why do we have PACS? Who created them and why?
Why did corporations suddenly begin forming PACs in the late 1970s?
Why did reformers try to curb PACs in the 1980s?
Did politicians begin refusing PAC contributions in the 1980s?
Were independent expenditures new?
What is a connected PAC?
How do the five categories of connected PACs differ from one another?
Do business and labor PACs do different things with their money in elections?
What are non-connected PACs?
What do ideological PACs do?
What do leadership PACs do?

6 Super PACs
Where did the super PAC come from?
What makes super PACs super?
What is a hybrid PAC?
Why is coordination between candidates and super PACs a problem?
What did Congress do about independent expenditures after Watergate?
How did Citizens United and SpeechNow make coordination between candidates and super PACs such a big problem?
What are the rules against candidates coordinating with super PACs?
How close did candidates and super PACs get in 2012?
How did the super PAC change the way presidential candidates ran their campaigns?
Stephen Colbert formed a super PAC on his Comedy Central TV show, The Colbert Report. What was that about?
Jeb Bush's super PAC did not help him at all. And Hillary Clinton's super PAC did not help her fend off Bernie Sanders. So how big a deal are super PACs, really?

7 Billionaires
There seem to be a lot of billionaire donors these days. Is this new?
What is different about megadonors today?
How did fundraising by presidential candidates in 2015 differ from previous elections?
But Jeb Bush finished 2015 far behind candidates who raised less money. So were the billionaires really all that important?
Were billionaires any more important in the Democrats' race?
What is the Koch brothers' network?
What did the Koch network do in the 2012 and 2014 elections?
How are other conservative billionaires becoming active in elections?
Are liberal billionaires doing anything similar to what the Koch brothers are doing?
Are individual liberal billionaires building personal political operations, as rich conservatives are doing?

8 Outside money
What was soft money?
Did both parties raise soft money?
How did the nature of soft money change after 1992?
What was the McCain-Feingold Act?
What is a 527?
Did 527s just replace party soft money?
What are 501(c) tax-exempt groups?
What was Wisconsin Right to Life v. FEC?
Was there still a lot of outside money in the 2008 election?
How did the FEC weaken disclosure rules for tax-exempt groups?
What are 501(c)(4)s?
How did Citizens United change the role of 501(c)s in election?
What was the controversy over the IRS's scrutiny of applications to form social welfare groups?
What did the American Bar Association recommend the IRS do about political activity by non-political groups?

9 Corporations, Unions, and Citizens United
What can corporations do in elections now that they could not do before Citizens United?
Did Citizens United overturn the Tillman Act's ban against political contributions?
Did the Tillman Act work? Or did corporations keep making campaign contributions after it banned them?
When did corporations and unions begin using their money to influence elections?
How did conservatives try to limit labor participation in elections?
Why did the Department of Justice challenge the legality of labor PACs in Pipefitters v. United States?
What was the issue in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti?
Why did the Supreme Court give First Amendment rights of political speech to corporations in Citizens United?
How big a change did Citizens United make to the way campaigns are financed?
What about corporate personhood? Did Citizens United say corporations are people?
Did Citizens United release a flood of corporate money for independent expenditures?
Citizens United also permitted unlimited spending by labor unions. Has that happened?
Critics of Citizens United also said it would let foreign money into U.S. elections. Has that happened?
Is the Republican party financed by business and the Democratic party by labor?
What about corporate lobbying? Isn't that at least as big a problem as campaign finance?
Is the Republican party financed by business and the Democratic party by labor?
Conclusion What Next?
Why does the future look bright for reform opponents?
Is there is any chance for reviving public funding for presidential elections?
What about public funding for state and city elections? Is that likely to continue?
Will small-donor programs be able to counter the surge of rich donors and democratize campaign finance?
Well-financed non-party groups seem to be more active than the parties in recent elections. Are the parties getting weaker?
Can the FEC be made to work?
Will disclosure survive?
There seems to be a lot of support for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. Is that likely to happen?
Why are the prospects for reform so poor?
The chances of curbing big money in elections would be a lot better if the 5-4 split on the Supreme Court went the other way. How likely is that?
Timeline of campaign finance laws and Supreme Court decisions
 
Glossary
Notes
Further Reading
Index

著者について: 

Robert E. Mutch is an independent scholar who specializes in the history of campaign finance. He is the author of Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform.

"Robert Mutch's writing is the gold standard of campaign finance. Clear and incisive, this is a must read for those who want to understand the U.S. system." --Trevor Potter, former Commissioner and Chairman of the Federal Election Commission
    
"Robert Mutch is one of our leading historians of campaign finance, displaying great skill in explaining the development of our complex campaign finance laws and regulations. His new work, providing further guidance through its complexity and controversies, is most welcome and will be an invaluable resource in the field." --Bob Bauer, Co-Chair of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration and Professor of Practice, New York University Law School
   
"How does campaign finance influence the way American democracy does and should work? Readers will come away with some important insights into that question after reading this important book."--CHOICE Reviews

商品情報

ISBN : 9780190274689

著者: 
Robert E. Mutch
ページ
240 ページ
フォーマット
Paperback
サイズ
140 x 210 mm
刊行日
2016年08月
シリーズ
What Everyone Needs to Know
カスタマーレビュー
0
(0)

同じカテゴリーの商品

カスタマーレビュー

まだレビューはありません

このページに掲載の「参考価格」は日本国内における希望小売価格です。当ウェブサイトでのご購入に対して特別価格が適用される場合、販売価格は「割引価格」として表示されます。なお、価格は予告なく変更されることがございますので、あらかじめご了承ください。

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®